Skip to main content

About your Search

20121001
20121031
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)
, and the implication is that he was the guy who took care of al qaeda. you have the sacking at the u.s. embassy, the killing of the ambassador. the administration did not on that story to coexist with their theme and how great an anti terror policy obama had. they deceived the country, sending susan rice out on the sunday shows and attending that this was the outcrop -- outgrowth of a demonstration. everybody over the age of nine could see that it was premeditated. that is why it was suppressed until it could no longer be suppressed. >> i am not aware of the conspiracy that charles has his own strange and wonderful sources -- >> how do you explain her -- >> i am going to try to explain my moderator's question about this. the problems were pulle -- the problem republicans have is that mitt romney has never c cracked the threshold of being a po it does punish the obama record, and there's no question that osama bin laden took the wind out of the cells of the republican candidates. it was an enormous credential for obama. but because romney chose paul ryan, he in no way filled out the emptiness of
policy. >> martha wallace began by asking about the attack on the u.s. consulate in benghazi. turns out this was not a demonstration that was hijacked by individual clusters of extremists. but it was a planned attack carried out by heavily armed individuals. there was a house hearing this week criticizing the state department for turning down requests for more help in securing the consulate. this used to be your field. if they ask for more security, why did they not get it? that is number one. no. 2, is there a cover-up here or an attempt to a cover-up? >> i have been in the position where i ask for something and did i get it from headquarters. i did during the cold war but the same kind of problem. this is the field headquarters issue that you have. obviously, that request had been granted. it came from the national security office. they should have followed up on the request. that is beyond the bells of the bureaucracy. but that is neither here nor there. >> what about the cover-up? >> i don't see a cover-up. sometimes, you should not jump up there and make the judgments without knowi
of the u.s. ambassador in 30 years. it is the sacking of our embassy, huge humiliation and defeat, and tragedy all wrapped into one. this president repeatedly misled the nation about its nature and origin again and again. there was a huge issue. >> let me ask a general question about the debates, and that is what kind of moderator do we prefer? do we want somebody who jumps in and does follow-up questions -- gov., and you have an answer, mr. president, answer -- >> look, i would argue for the most non interventionist. the ideal debate is one that is rebek -- andto now, 48 electoral votes, a question on foreign policy to you, mr. president. every sunday over the years we get over 300 years of the sunday acquisitions, the tim russert idea. here we have 4.5 precious hours where we see the two men on their own with a referee who simply keeps time and allows them to deal with each other. this is a unique way to do this. that is what the debate is about. when you had at lincoln douglas -- lincoln-douglas, you did not have candy crowley . >> it happened in the debate between elizeth rr a
. this is the first assassination of u.s. ambassador in 30 years, the sacking of our embassy, a huge humiliation and defeat, and tragedy all wrapped up into one, and this president repeatedly misled the nation about its nature and origins again and again. i think it is a huge issue. >> let me ask a general question about the debates. what kind of monitor do we prefer? do we want somebody to jobs in and does follow -- who jumps in and does follow-up questions? is that what we want? >> here is my argument. every sunday over the year, we get 300 hours of sunday acquisitions, the tim russert idea. here we have a 4.5 precious hours were instead of that, we want to see the two men on their own with a referee who simply keeps time and allows them to deal with each other. this is a unique way to do this. that is what the debate is about. you had a lincoln-douglas, you did not have candy crowley intervening. i think that in general, it ought to be left because it is a unique opportunity. >> it actually happened in the debate between elizabeth warren and scott brown in massachusetts. all the moderator did
. >> mart raddatz began by asking about the attack at the u.s. consul in benghazi. it turns out that this was not a demonstration hijacked by extremists. but it was a planned attack carried out by heavily armed individuals. there was a a house hearing on this this week. amer secret official criticized the state department for turning down a request for more help. this used to be your area. why did they turn d down requests for security? and is there a coverup? >>>> i have been in the position where i have asked for something and i can get it from headquarters, from people who are not on the ground and cannot appreciate what you are doing on the ground. is is the field headquarters issue that you have. obviously that reququest had been granted and it did not come from the national guard. they should have followed that request. that is bebeyond the bels of the bureaucracy of the state department. it doesn't get to the secretary muchch less to the white hous i do not see a cover-up. they did not doing enough and sometimes you can jump out thehere and made judgments without knowing
. this i is not a trivial issue. this the first assassination of u.s. ambassador in 30 years, and sacking of our embassy, a huge humiliating defeat, andnd tragedy all wrapped into one, and thi president repeatedly misled the nation about its nature and origin as a [ minto ] you know, those ads saying mitt romney would ban all abortions and contraception seemed a bit extreme. so o i looked into it. turns out, romney doesn't oppose contraception at all. in fact, he thinks abortion should be an option in cases of rape, incest, or to save a mother's life. this issue's important to me but i'm more concerned about the debt our children will be left with. i voted for president obama last time but we just can't afford four more years. [ romney ] i'm mitt romney aand i approve this message. [ male announcer ] this commercial is not about getting fios. it's about getting fios. that moment after you finally got it that you actually get it. when you see up close the difference 100% fiber optics really makes and you say to yourself "whoa...we are not
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)